![]() |
Dr. John R. McIntyre Associate Professor Department of Education Coordinator of Graduate Program in Educational Administration & Supervision
|
|
|
|||||||
| Pre-requisite: | |||||||
| None | |||||||
| Objectives: | |||||||
| 1. The student will understand the laws and regulations in New Jersey that govern the supervision and evaluation of tenured and non-tenured teaching staff. | |||||||
| 2. The student will become aware of several models for conducting supervision of instructional and non-instructional staff members, and the general nature of differentiated supervision as a framework for staff supervision. | |||||||
| 3. The student will engage in simulations of supervisor-teacher conferences relative to instructional supervision, and practice data-collection techniques using videotaped examples. | |||||||
| 4. The student will view and analyze videotapes depicting instruction and the various phases of the supervisory process. | |||||||
| 5. The student will be acquainted with various definitions and components of teaching as reflected in various observational tools. | |||||||
| Methods of Conducting Class: | |||||||
| 1. Lecture and discussion of assigned readings, simulations, and videos. | |||||||
| 2. Conducting simulations with student trainees, peers, and fellow students. | |||||||
| 3. Viewing, analyzing, and critiquing videotapes of actual teaching episodes. | |||||||
| 4. Practicing data collection techniques for classroom observation | |||||||
| 5. Research into the nature of teaching and its relationship to supervision | |||||||
| 6. Respond to problem: What is effective teaching? How can one improve teaching through supervision? How can effective supervision be implemented? | |||||||
| Methods of Student Evaluation: | |||||||
| 1. Proposed revision of current district observation/evaluation forms, or rationale for retaining status quo. | |||||||
| 2. Evaluation of Supervisory conferences with undergraduates, peers, or classmates. | |||||||
| 3. Effective participation in simulated and videotaped activities | |||||||
| 4. Analysis and discussion of lesson plan in pre-observation conference. | |||||||
| 5. Text/Readings and class participation | |||||||
| 6. Final Report of response to problem posed in #6: Methods of Conducting Class | |||||||
| Course Content: | |||||||
| A. Essential Questions re: Teaching and the Supervision of Teachers and Instruction | |||||||
| B. Purposes of Supervision/ Your supervisory experiences | |||||||
| C. Kinds of Competencies among Teachers | |||||||
| D. Pre- Observation Conferencing | |||||||
| E. Law and regulations re: Supervision in New Jersey | |||||||
| F. Different Forms of Supervision: Clinical Supervision; Cognitive Coaching; The Tri-level Supervisory model | |||||||
| G. Video: Conferencing Techniques (Another Set of Eyes) | |||||||
| H. Observation and Data-Gathering Skills | |||||||
| i. Selective Verbatim | |||||||
| ii. At Task | |||||||
| iii. Verbal Flow | |||||||
| iv. Interaction Analysis | |||||||
| I. Applying Observation Skills with Videotaped Lessons | |||||||
| J. Post-Observation Conferences | |||||||
| K. Writing the Observation Report/Annual Evaluation/P.I.P. & Staff Development Plan (100 hours) | |||||||
| L. The Differentiated System | |||||||
| M. Presentation of Solutions to Teaching/Supervision Problem | |||||||
| Required Texts and Supplementary Readings: | |||||||
| Required: Saphier, J. (1993). How to make supervision and evaluation really work. Ma.: Research for better teaching. | |||||||
| Supplementary Readings: Danielson,C. and McGreal,T.(2000). Teacher evaluation: To enhance professional practice.Princeton,N.J.: ETS;ASCD. | |||||||
|
Examples of Standards: http://www.oct.on.ca/english/professional_affairs/standards.htm |
|||||||